Legal Opinion
Zamarron v. Adame
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided October 20, 1993No. 08-92-00453-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LARSEN, Justice.
Jesus Zamarron appeals from a take nothing judgment in favor of Gilberto Adame, Jr. Zamarron sued Adame for negligence arising out of a car accident. A jury found Zamar-ron 75 percent negligent and Adame 25 percent negligent. Zamarron claims this verdict was legally and factually insufficient. We affirm.
FACTS
On May 9, 1991, around 10 p.m., Jesus Zamarron was driving home from a friend’s house, where he and his wife had eaten dinner and Zamarron drank some beer. Zamar-ron was driving in the left-hand, east-bound lane of Rojas street, a four-lane road divided by a median,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re King's EstateTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Benoit v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Alm v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 1986
- Stafford v. StaffordTexas Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of El Paso v. Kolster, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
- Carl A. Raffen and Eleanor Raffen, Individually, and as Survivors of Thomas Dugan Raffen, Decedent v. Ford Motor Company Milton Joseph Hayes, Individually, and D/B/A the Shanty And Dorothy Elizabeth Combs, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
- Edward D. Jones & Company and Delmar "Bo" McKinney v. Pat Fletcher, Independent of the Estate of Beatrice Clark Cairns, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995