Legal Opinion

Sorenson v. Bridge Capital Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 2006PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered November 3, 2005, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, granted defendants’ motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the claim for fraud in the inducement and cancelled the notice of pendency, unanimously modified, on the law, the notice of pendency reinstated, and otherwise affirmed, without costs. Appeal from order, same *1145court, Justice and entry date, which denied a stay of cancellation of the notice of pendency, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as academic.

The merger and other clauses in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. 5303 Realty Corp. v. O & Y Equity Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Fabozzi v. CoppaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. Klein v. GutmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  4. McGowan v. Winant Place AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  5. Elghanayan v. ElghanayanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sorenson v. WolfsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API