Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1934No. 8 Div. 744PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appellant was tried, and convicted, for and of the offense charged in the single count of the indictment which was submitted to the jury, the same being in words and figures as follows, to wit:

"The Grand Jury of said County, further charge that before the finding of this indictment: Tom B. Smith, whose christian name is otherwise unknown to the grand jury, while Clerk of the City of Florence, Alabama, a municipal corporation, who was then and there as such Clerk charged or intrusted with the collection, receipt, safekeeping, transfer or disbursement of money or funds belonging to or under the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DoddAlabama Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Ex Parte CowartSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  3. Wilkerson v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Wilkerson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  2. Smith v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API