Martin
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 296, Jan. T., 1897, by David B. Martin et al., from decree of O. C. Phila.' Co., April T., 1897, No. 169, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 296, Jan. T., 1897, by David B. Martin et al., from decree of O. C. Phila.' Co., April T., 1897, No. 169, dismissing exceptions to adjudication. Exceptions to adjudication. The subject of controversy arose under the following clause of the will of Joseph J. Martin, deceased: “ All the rest, residue and remainder of my estate of whatsoever kind and nature and wherever situated, together with such portion of my estate as may become part of my residuary estate, under the preceding items hereof, I give, devise and bequeath unto my executors hereinafter named, in trust nevertheless, to…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
We find no error in this record that requires reversal or mod*57ification of the decree. The questions involved have been so satisfactorily disposed of by the learned judge of the court below in his opinion, dismissing appellants’ exceptions and confirming the adjudication, that further discussion of either of them is unnecessary.
On his opinion the decree is affirmed and appeal dismissed at appellants’ costs.
2Cited by12 opinions
- Foss v. State Bank and Trust Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1931
- Raleigh's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
- Sternbergh's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- In re Estate of EdwardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
- Roney's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.