Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wittrup v. Chicago & Northwestern Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided March 19, 1975No. 2-56466Published

1DissentRees, Justice

The majority remands this case for new trial, holding the railroad’s alleged negligence in failing to post signs warning of low clearance under its overpass and plaintiff’s driver’s alleged contributory negligence in misjudging the clearance beneath that overpass were issues which should have been submitted to the jury. I cannot agree, and would hold trial court correctly decided both those issues as a matter of law in favor of defendant.

I. The traditional formula for the elements necessary to a cause of action founded upon negligence contemplates proof defendant was under an antecedent duty…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Susan Passwaters, by Donald Passwaters, Her Father and Next Friend, and Donald Passwaters v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1972
  2. Norfolk Southern Ry. Co. v. Davis Frozen Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1952
  3. Carr v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1948
  4. Illinois Central Railroad Company v. Roy FarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. Lewie Montgomery Trucking Co. v. Southern Pacific Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API