Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Norton v. Janing
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided January 26, 1968No. 36703PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarter, J.
The relator commenced this action for a writ of habeas, corpus to test the constitutionality of section 52-119, R. R. S. 1943. From a denial of the writ by the district court for Douglas County, relator appeals.
The relator, a contractor, was charged with the violation of section 52-119, R. R. S. 1943, in that he entered into a contract with Kathryn F. Kusek for the erection of a garage building and the repair of a retaining wall and concrete work and, having received the full contract price, failed to apply the money so received in payment of the claims of Larson Cement Stone Company and *540McCan…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Morrison v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Bailey v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Bandini Petroleum Co. v. Superior Court, Los Angeles Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Pollock v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Pauly v. KeeblerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In the Matter of Christopher Wallace Boyle, Debtor. Christopher Wallace Boyle v. Abilene Lumber, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- In the Matter of Isaac Dloogoff, Bankrupt. Geraldine Devaney v. Isaac DloogoffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
- Miller v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. RepsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- State v. HocuttNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.