Bloom v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
Erorn the Huntington Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBaker, C. J.
— Appellant was convicted of manslaughter. Two rulings are presented as erroneous, — denying a new *294trial, and pronouncing judgment under the indeterminate sentence law.
It has been decided repeatedly that the indeterminate sentence law is valid. Miller v. State, 149 Ind. 607; Skelton v. State, 149 Ind. 641; Vancleave v. State, 150 Ind. 273; Wilson v. State, 150 Ind. 697; Davis v. State, 152 Ind. 145. The majority of the court see no reason for departing from those decisions.
Objection is made to the verdict because it states that the defendant “is about fifty-five years old”. Appellant was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Miller v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Colip v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
- Vancleave v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Skelton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
- Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- United States v. Bennie L. PetersonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Loftis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1971
- Terry v. ByersIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. ChildersOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. PlumleeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.