Ehrlich v. Mangicapra

Appellant, Abraham Ehrlich, held a mortgage executed by both appellees, Raymond (Raymond) and Diane (Diane) Mangicapra. The mortgage secured payment of a promissory note executed by Raymond but not by Diane. Appellant sought to foreclose the mortgage and also to have Diane held personally liable on the balance due on the note based on a covenant in the mortgage which provides:

And the mortgagor hereby further covenants and agrees to pay promptly when due the principal and interest and other sums of money provided for in said note and this mortgage, or either....

Ehrlich now appeals a trial…