Harh Hak Sae v. Lindsay
Hawaii Supreme Court
ORIGINAL.
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION.
Tbe plaintiff, having obtained a judgment in an action on a promissory note written in Korean characters, took out execution which was levied by the officer, when the defendant within ten days after entry of the judgment filed a motion to vacate the judgment and for a new trial on the ground, as shown by an affidavit, that the note, when correctly translated, showed that he was not its maker but a witness to the signature of the maker. A new trial was ordered but the judgment has not been vacated and no bond has been filed by the defendant “conditioned for the payment of the full…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- In Re CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- In Re RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- In Re New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Alexander v. CrollottSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peterson v. McKinleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
- Bolman v. JohnsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1942
- Bolman v. JohnsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1942