Legal Opinion

Harh Hak Sae v. Lindsay

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

ORIGINAL.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Tbe plaintiff, having obtained a judgment in an action on a promissory note written in Korean characters, took out execution which was levied by the officer, when the defendant within ten days after entry of the judgment filed a motion to vacate the judgment and for a new trial on the ground, as shown by an affidavit, that the note, when correctly translated, showed that he was not its maker but a witness to the signature of the maker. A new trial was ordered but the judgment has not been vacated and no bond has been filed by the defendant “conditioned for the payment of the full…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. In Re CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. In Re RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. In Re New York & Porto Rico Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
  5. Alexander v. CrollottSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Peterson v. McKinleyHawaii Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Bolman v. JohnsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Bolman v. JohnsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API