Legal Opinion

Izard County Board of Education v. Violet Hill School District No. 1

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 25, 1984No. CA 83-122PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Judge.

This case involves a boundary line dispute between the Oxford and Violet Hill school districts. The trial court decided the dispute in Violet Hill’s favor. Oxford contends on appeal that the court’s decision is against the preponderance of the evidence and that the court erred by applying the wrong law. We affirm.

In its brief, Oxford characterizes this action as the “battle of the maps” — a vivid description depicting a boundary dispute caused in large part because of variances in four different maps, each supposedly reflecting the correct line dividing the two school…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. National Investors Fire & Casualty Insurance v. ChandlerCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. Flash TV Sales and Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Orintas v. MeadowsCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  3. Maddox v. St. Paul School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API