Joiner v. Paradice
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Complaint; from city court of Sandersville — Judge Jordan. September 27, 1920. The action was upon promissory notes of The defendant, Mrs. E. A. Joiner, payable to L. D. Paradice, the plaintiff. The defendant pleaded that the notes were executed in settlement of a debt of her husband, for which she was not liable. On the trial she testified to this effect.
Read the full summary
Complaint; from city court of Sandersville — Judge Jordan. September 27, 1920. The action was upon promissory notes of The defendant, Mrs. E. A. Joiner, payable to L. D. Paradice, the plaintiff. The defendant pleaded that the notes were executed in settlement of a debt of her husband, for which she was not liable. On the trial she testified to this effect. The plaintiff testified that he sold to the defendant, and not to her husband, the stock of goods for which the notes were given; that the husband offered to sign the notes as principal, with the wife as security, but he declined the offer…
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. Under repeated rulings of this, court and of the Supreme Court, a ground of a motion for a new trial will not he considered unless it is complete and understandable within itself.
[a) A ground based upon the exclusion of material evidence is too incomplete to he considered where it fails to show on what ground the evidence was excluded or wherein the court erred in excluding it, or where the materiality of the evidence cannot be ascertained without air examination of other parts of the record. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Jaques, 23 Ga. App. 396(2) (98 S. E. 357); Corona v. DeLaval…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Jaques & Tinsley Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
- Summerlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Corona v. DeLaval Separator Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cathey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1922