Legal Opinion

Whitney v. Commonwealth

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 1, 1906PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKnowlton, C. J.

This is a petition for an assessment of damages growing out of a taking of land in Winchester by the metropolitan park commissioners in 1898, under the authority of *533Sts. 1894, c. 288, and 1895, c. 450. The first question is whether the petitioners are entitled to a substantial sum or only to nominal damages. In the original taking a strip of the petitioners’ land seven feet wide, on the northerly side of Walnut Street, was included, and this gave the petitioners a vested right to compensation for the land taken, and also for damages caused to their remaining land. But this right was subject…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hyde v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Sheldon v. Boston & Albany RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898
  3. Moseley v. WashburnMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1896
  4. Commonwealth v. HedenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895
  5. Spencer v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Little v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  2. Dodge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1919
  3. Karrick v. WetmoreMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  4. Anzalone v. Metropolitan District CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  5. State v. BealNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1944

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API