Legal Opinion

United States v. Terrence Newsome

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1990No. 89-1379PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal under the sentencing guidelines. The defendant-appellant, Terrence Newsome, entered into a plea agreement that said his maximum term of imprisonment could not exceed 57 months. The guideline sentence range was only 33-41 months. Without specifying a legitimate reason for a departure from the guideline range, according to Mr. New-some's submission on appeal, the district court imposed a sentence of 57 months, the maximum permitted under the plea agreement.

Mr. Newsome contends that (a) the sentence was imposed in violation of law, and (b) the…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Keith PickettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Dennis HarotunianCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Julio La Guardia, United States of America v. Eredia Josefa Jimenez-MinallaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Gilberto Ocasio, A/K/A Gilberto Ocasio AgostoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Lynda Gail Brewer and Teresa K. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API