Legal Opinion

B. B. Chemical Co. v. Cataract Chemical Co.

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided February 6, 1940No. 2218Published

1Opinion of the Court

KNIGHT, District Judge.

This suit is for infringement of Wedger Patent No. 1,959,321, granted May 15, 1934, on an application filed December, 29, 1931. It purports to cover a so-called “viscous softener” for activating cement applied to parts of shoe soles preparatory to cementing the parts together. Claims 1, 2, 6 and 21, product claims, and Claims 19 and 20, method claims, are in issue. Title in the plaintiff is admitted, as is the manufacture and sale of the alleged infringing compositions. Such compositions are herein known as Cataract No. 50 and Cataract No. 12. The former was brought on…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. General Electric Co. v. Wabash Appliance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Leitch Manufacturing Co. v. Barber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. Holland Furniture Co. v. Perkins Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API