Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rankin v. Kellam

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 24, 1965No. 11269Published

1DissentHughes, Justice

The purpose of the Profit-Sharing and Incentive Plan before us is stated to be:

“Purpose
“The purpose of this Plan is to help employees provide security for their retirement and to provide a means for the sharing with employees of profits of the Employer,”
“Employees” in the Plan are defined by it to mean “all active officers of the Corporation and all employees receiving compensation for their services.”

*312Section 2-2 of the Plan provides:

“Section 2-2. Participants. All employees who have or will have, completed one year of continuous service with the Employer shall become eligible to participate…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lee v. LeeTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Herring v. BlakeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Brocklehurst & Potter Co. v. MarschMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  4. Patton v. Babson's Statistical Organization, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. Gardner v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API