Legal Opinion

Williams v. Wann ex rel. Lewis

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1847PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPericins, J.

George Wann, suing for the use of Nathaniel Lewis, commenced an action of debt in the Fayette Circuit Court against Thomas Williams and Amos Chapman, upon a promissory note. Pleas, 1. Nil debent; 2. Payment; 4. No title to the note sued on. The following is the third plea: “And for a further plea in this behalf the said defendants say actio non, because they say that the said Nathaniel Lewis, for whose use this suit is prosecuted, was never in esse, and this they are ready to verify, wherefore they pray judgment,” &c. Issues of fact were formed on the 1st, 2d, and 4th pleas, and to the 3d…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. Clark's ExecutorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1812
  2. March v. DavisonNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  3. Leggett v. PostleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  4. Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1835

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Colgate v. Compagnie Francaise du Telegraphs de Paris a New YorkU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1885
  2. Indianapolis Gas Co. v. City of IndianapolisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Indiana · 1898
  3. Russell v. DickeschiedWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Bright v. CoffmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API