Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Espalla

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1929No. 1 Div. 551PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas', J.

The suit was in the nature of ejectment. The trial was by the court without a jury, and the judgment was for de fend ant.

Both parties derived title from the common source, Arthur Frazier. The chain of plaintiff’s record title was the deed of James H. Wilson to Arthur Frazier and the decree confirming the register’s report in suit fox-divorce and alimony, in which she was invested with the defendant Frazier’s title to the lot occupied as their homestead. The dwelling thereon having been destroyed by fire, the husband collected the insurance and moved to another place. Defendant’s title is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blum v. CarterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  2. Tharp v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Witherington & Co. v. MasonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
  4. Preiss v. CampbellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  5. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sykes v. SykesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  2. Bond v. Avondale Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  3. Cox v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  4. In Re HughesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
  5. In Re SimmonsDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API