Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided April 8, 1946No. 36006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.

Appellants were convicted of grand larceny. We direct our attention only to the action of the trial judge in refusing a continuance of the case.

Motion for continuance was seasonably made and contained sworn averments in substance as follows: Defendants were charged with the theft of sheep; that in fact they were purchased from one Earl Cox from whom bills of sale were procured; that Cox is the only witness who could testify to this fact and that he was on board a ship at sea as a member of the Merchant Marine forces and is unavailable as a witness; that process for him had been requested but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lamar v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farris v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Roussel v. HuttonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Newell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Thigpen v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Gallego v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API