Jackson v. State
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtAlexander, J.
Appellants were convicted of grand larceny. We direct our attention only to the action of the trial judge in refusing a continuance of the case.
Motion for continuance was seasonably made and contained sworn averments in substance as follows: Defendants were charged with the theft of sheep; that in fact they were purchased from one Earl Cox from whom bills of sale were procured; that Cox is the only witness who could testify to this fact and that he was on board a ship at sea as a member of the Merchant Marine forces and is unavailable as a witness; that process for him had been requested but…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Lamar v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by7 opinions
- Farris v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
- Roussel v. HuttonMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Newell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1950
- Thigpen v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1949
- Gallego v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.