Legal Opinion

Peluso v. Smith

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1989PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Norman C. Ryp, J.

A. issue

Whether a former felon, with a certificate of relief from *643 disability, is entitled to any procedural due process before a New York City municipal agency's denial of license, and to the presumption of rehabilitation under article 23-A of the Correction Law.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding petitioner, Peter A. Peluso, seeks from respondents, Charles M. Smith as Commissioner of the New York City Department of Buildings (NYC-D/B) and Judith A. Levitt, as Director of the Department of Personnel of the City of New York (NYC-D/P) (a) issuance of a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bonacorsa v. Van LindtNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
  2. Marra v. City of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. MATTER OF REINGOLD v. KochNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Reingold v. KochAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  5. Stewart v. Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Allah v. City of New York Department of Parks & RecreationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. People v. CoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API