Paton v. Rose
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MYERS, Associate Judge.
Appellant as landlord filed suit pro se against certain tenants for an alleged breach of their rental agreement and demanded a jury trial. Thereafter, at .pretrial, - it was ascertained that he was not a member of the bar. The pretrial judge commented on the difficulties inherent in a jury, trial under these circumstances and stated he would not let the case be set on the jury calendar. He;offered, appellant' the alternative of an opportunity to retain counsel to present his case or to withdraw his jury demand. Faced with having to make an election, appellant agreed to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Capital Traction Co. v. HofSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
3Cited by5 opinions
- Abell v. Laihsing WangDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Jewell R. Mazique v. Edward C. MaziqueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- MacLeod v. Georgetown University Medical CenterDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- Solomon v. Fairfax Village Condominium IV Unit Owner's Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
- Parker v. WallaceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971