Legal Opinion

Vaco v. Arellano

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated July 31, 2009, which denied his motion for leave to renew his opposition to the motion of the defendants Edgar Arellano and Campuzano Car Service, and the separate motion of the defendants Cedric Kenville Jack and Veronica Charles, for summary judgment *792dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them on the ground that he did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d), which had been granted in an order of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pommells v. PerezNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. Gonzalez v. Vigo Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. Ralat v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. Eusebio v. YannettiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Friedman, Harfenist, Langer & Kraut v. RosenthalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  2. In re Dior Polo G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API