Legal Opinion
State Ex Inf. McKittrick v. Bode
Supreme Court of Missouri
Decided February 25, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGantt, J.
Original proceeding in quo tvararnto to oust respondent from the position of Director of Conservation. On the filing of an amended answer, relator moved for judgment.
It is admitted that under Constitutional Amendment No. 4 (Laws of 1937, pp. 614, 615), and on November 15, 1937, the Conservation Commission appointed respondent to the position; that at said timé he was a resident but had not resided in the State one year next preceding his appointment; that he accepted the appointment, duly qualified, entered upon the duties of the position, and continues to perform the same.
In this connection…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. MauriceU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1823
- State ex rel. Walker v. BusSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- People ex rel. Throop v. LangdonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- State Ex Rel. Westhues v. SullivanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- Rowland v. . Mayor, Etc., City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kirby v. NolteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
- Green v. BookwalterDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Webb v. PiggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- State Ex Rel. Scobee v. MeriwetherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Glass v. SloanTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.