Goldman v. Forcier
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the CourtCapotosto, J.
These two actions of trespass on the case were brought under general laws 1923, chapter 396, sec. 10, now general laws 1938, chapter 607, § 14, to recover the value of certain property alleged to have been destroyed or injured during a riot, in the city of Woonsocket, on September 13, 1934. The cases were tried together before a justice of the superior court sitting without a jury. He rendered a decision for the plaintiff in each case in the following amounts: $4718.71 for Goldman and $578.87 for Stein, interest included. The defendant duly excepted to each of these decisions.
Since the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Yalenezian v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
- Spring Valley Coal Co. v. City of Spring ValleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
- Mayor of Balto v. PoultneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866
3Cited by6 opinions
- Arena v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
- CIC-Newport Associates v. SteinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- A & B AUTO STORES v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
- Huntley v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
- Chaharyn v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.