Legal Opinion

Goldman v. Forcier

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided July 27, 1942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCapotosto, J.

These two actions of trespass on the case were brought under general laws 1923, chapter 396, sec. 10, now general laws 1938, chapter 607, § 14, to recover the value of certain property alleged to have been destroyed or injured during a riot, in the city of Woonsocket, on September 13, 1934. The cases were tried together before a justice of the superior court sitting without a jury. He rendered a decision for the plaintiff in each case in the following amounts: $4718.71 for Goldman and $578.87 for Stein, interest included. The defendant duly excepted to each of these decisions.

Since the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Yalenezian v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Spring Valley Coal Co. v. City of Spring ValleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
  3. Mayor of Balto v. PoultneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1866

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arena v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2007
  2. CIC-Newport Associates v. SteinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  3. A & B AUTO STORES v. City of NewarkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  4. Huntley v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  5. Chaharyn v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API