Legal Opinion

In re Dizak

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 24, 1983PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to practice as an attorney and counselor at law in January, 1970 by the Appellate Division, Fourth Department. During all of the pertinent periods he has maintained an office for the practice of law in this department. Prior to 1975 the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department’s predecessor (herein Departmental Disciplinary Committee) charged him with three counts of professional misconduct involving use of a slug instead of a subway token to gain admission to the New York City subway system, paying *681$150 to a nonattorney…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re GinsbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. In re KaseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. In re GotkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. In re DizakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re BraunsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. In re WeinstatAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API