Legal Opinion

David Canales, Jr., Individually, and as Next Friend of David Adrian Canales, and Angie Marie Canales v. Edward Curtis Vandenberg

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided October 1, 2024No. 14-22-00404-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

Affirmed as Modified and Majority and Dissenting Opinions filed October 1, 2024. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-22-00404-CV DAVID CANALES, JR., INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS NEXT FRIEND OF DAVID ADRIAN CANALES, AND ANGIE MARIE CANALES, Appellants / Cross-Appellees V. EDWARD CURTIS VANDENBERG, Appellee / Cross-Appellant On Appeal from the 239th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 71132 DISSENTING OPINION I write separately to express my disagreement with the majority’s broad conclusion that Vandenberg cannot recover mental-anguish damages because the Canaleses acted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Parkway Co. v. WoodruffTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. City of Tyler v. LikesTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Spann v. City of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Crosstex North Texas Pipeline, L.P., N/K/A Enlink North Texas Pipeline, Lp v. Andrew Gardiner and Shannon GardinerTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Holubec v. BrandenbergerTexas Supreme Court · 2003

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API