Pederick v. Searle

*239The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Tilghman C. J.

Two reasons are given for the rejection of this evidence. 1. That the defendant having accepted a lease, was estopped from controverting the title of his landlord. 2. That the defendant having confessed judgment in Dewitt’s ejectment, and possession having been actually delivered to Philip Heermans, who afterwards conveyed to the plaintiff, the continuity of the defendant’s possession was broken, and therefore his title under the act of limitations was destroyed.

1. If the Court perceive, that the evidence offered is not relevant, they…