Legal Opinion

Stemple v. Carson

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 2, 1951No. Appeal, 117PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

Per Curiam,

We are satisfied that the learned court below correctly ruled that the Common Pleas Court was without jurisdiction to grant the relief prayed for in the bill and that the Orphans’ Court alone has exclusive jurisdiction. To what Judge Gibson has so well said we merely add that the title to the stock in question had passed to a decedent and was in his possession at his death. His executor, who now holds possession, is under the control and supervision of the Orphans’ Court. The title is being attacked as voidable because of material misrepresentations. The action to rescind is…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Trout v. LukeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  2. Johnson v. Trustees of the General Assembly of the Church of the Lord Jesus Christ of the Apostolic FaithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Esposita v. Peden, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1978
  4. Riggio v. Riggio, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1952
  5. Robinson v. Robinson, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API