State v. Bell
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Spencer, J.:
This is a direct appeal from conviction of attempted burglary (K.S.A. 21-3301, 21-3715).
Initially it is argued the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion for acquittal under K.S.A. 22-3419. We have reviewed the record on appeal and, although the evidence against defendant was primarily circumstantial, we find it to be such that reasonable minds might fairly conclude guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, it was not error to deny the motion for acquittal. See State v. White & Stewart, 225 Kan. 87, 587 P.2d 1259 (1978); State v. Colbert, 221 Kan. 203, 557 P.2d 1235…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. White & StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- State v. ColbertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
3Cited by8 opinions
- Anderson v. BruceSupreme Court of Kansas · 2002
- State v. ReedSupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- State v. AshleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1985
- State v. TrudeauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.