Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Ladarius Vickers

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 1, 2016No. A16A0792Published

1ConcurrenceRickman, Judge

I disagree with the majority opinion to the extent that it can be read to create a bright-line rule that the automobile exception may never justify the warrantless search of a vehicle located on a private residence — even within its curtilage — or implies that such a rule is *278already established under Georgia law. Nevertheless, I am constrained to affirm the ruling of the trial court under our standard of review and the arguments preserved before that court.

I write separately because I think it important to recognize that at no time did the officers in this case act unreasonably in the context…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Scott v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Maryland v. MacOnSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Hughes v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API