Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 16, 1907No. 3821PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BROOKS, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25.

The first ground of complaint in the motion for a new trial is that the verdict reads as follows: “We the juror find the defendant guilty and assess his punishment at a fine of $35 (Twenty-five dollars). J. M. Brown, Foreman.” Appellant insists that the word “juror” being used instead of the word “jury” thereby shows on its face only one man of the jury rendered the verdict. Bad spelling and bad grammar will not vitiate a verdict, but we will look to the clear import of the words to…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bennett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1916
  2. Graham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Clark v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Laird v. Williams & ChastainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API