Legal Opinion

Harrell v. Harrell

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1985No. C-3884PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Per curiam

This' is a partition suit brought by a former spouse seeking division of military nondisability retirement benefits. The trial court held that the suit was foreclosed by this court’s opinion in Trahan v. Trahan (Trahan I), 626 S.W.2d 485 (Tex.1981). The court of appeals reversed the judgment and remanded the cause for a new trial. 684 S.W.2d 118 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1984). On rehearing, 684 S.W.2d at 123, the court of appeals reversed itself and rendered judgment that Opal take nothing in her partition action. Because the court of appeals opinion on motion for rehearing conflicts with…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Busby v. BusbyTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Taggart v. TaggartTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Taylor v. CatalonTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Keller v. KellerTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Harrell v. Harrell, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1984

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Laster v. First Huntsville Properties Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Wilde v. MurchieTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Buys v. BuysTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Southern v. GlennMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Koepke v. KoepkeTexas Supreme Court · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API