Legal Opinion

Monnet v. Merz

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 2, 1892PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from judgment on report of referee. Action by Prosper Monnet and another against Henry Merz. From a judgment for defendant, plaintiffs appeal.

1Per curiam

The action is virtually for an accounting between the plaintiff, a foreign consignor, and the defendant, his consignee in this country. This appeal involves the correctness of a ruling, which charged the appellant with the sum of $6,126.09. That charge arose from the following facts. The plaintiff consigned certain goods to the defendant. After they had arrived in this country, the United States began a suit against the defendant to recover $75,000, under sections 2839, 2864, Rev. St. U. S., and section 16, Act June 22, 1874. On February 9, 1883, the United States accepted from the defendant…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Monnet v. MerzThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API