Legal Opinion · Dissent

Marrama v. Citizens Bank

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 21, 2007No. 05-996Published

1Dissent

Justice ALITO, with whom THE CHIEF JUSTICE, Justice SCALIA, and Justice THOMAS join,

dissenting.

Under the clear terms of the Bankruptcy Code, a debtor who initially files a petition under Chapter 7 has the right to convert the case to another chapter under which the case is eligible to proceed. The Court, however, holds that a debtor’s conversion right is conditioned upon a bankruptcy judge’s finding of “good faith.” Because the imposition of this condition is inconsistent with the Bankruptcy Code, I respectfully dissent.

I

The Bankruptcy Code unambiguously provides that a debtor who has filed a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Norwest Bank Worthington v. AhlersSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. United States Realty & Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  4. Miller v. Cardinale (In Re Deville)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. Everly v. 4745 Second Avenue, Ltd. (In Re Everly)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API