Walter W. Oeflein, Inc. v. Voell

Defendant contends, first, that the findings of the trial court are against the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence. We are satisfied that this contention is without merit. The issue of fact was whether defendant was employed upon a straight salary basis or under *134an agreement entitling him to share in the profits of the contract under which the building was constructed. Defendant produced some testimony of statements made by Oeflein in his lifetime, to the effect that defendant was to be employed upon a profit-sharing basis. It is contended that the evidence as to Oeflein’s…