Legal Opinion
Bromley Shepard Co. v. Roelker
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 9, 1933No. 3769PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LOWELL, District Judge.
Motion to dismiss. This ease raises a question of set-off. A bill in equity was brought by the Shepard Company and Mrs. Shepard jointly against the receiver of the Middlesex National Bank. The Shepard Company owed the bank $5,000 on a joint note. When the bank was closed by the order of the Comptroller, the bank was indebted to each of them for separate deposits in the sums of more than $5,000’. The company and Mrs. Shepard seek to enjoin the receiver of the bank from suing them, and ask that the deposits due each of the joint makers individually be set off against…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tucker v. OxleySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Auten v. United States Nat. Bank of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Gray v. RolloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Watkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Piotrowski v. CzerwinskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Roelker v. Bromley-Shepard Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1934