Legal Opinion

Caldwell's Well Drilling, Inc. v. Moore

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 18, 1986No. 8524DC1095PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEDRICK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion to amend its complaint. After the statutory time for amending pleadings as a matter of course has elapsed, a motion to amend a complaint pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 15(a) is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge and the denial of such motion is not reviewable on appeal absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion. Smith v. McRary, 306 N.C. 664, 295 S.E. 2d 444 (1982). In the present case, there is no showing that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to amend…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Smith v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Lowe's of Fayetteville, Inc. v. QuigleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. WILSON ELECTRIC COMPANY v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Walker v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Denning-Boyles v. WCES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  3. Outer Banks Contractors, Inc. v. Daniels & Daniels Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. Rabon v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. Johnson v. Beverly-Hanks & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API