Caldwell's Well Drilling, Inc. v. Moore
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in denying its motion to amend its complaint. After the statutory time for amending pleadings as a matter of course has elapsed, a motion to amend a complaint pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 15(a) is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial judge and the denial of such motion is not reviewable on appeal absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion. Smith v. McRary, 306 N.C. 664, 295 S.E. 2d 444 (1982). In the present case, there is no showing that the trial court abused its discretion in denying the motion to amend…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Smith v. McRarySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- Lowe's of Fayetteville, Inc. v. QuigleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- WILSON ELECTRIC COMPANY v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
3Cited by10 opinions
- Walker v. SloanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Denning-Boyles v. WCES, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- Outer Banks Contractors, Inc. v. Daniels & Daniels Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
- Rabon v. HopkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Johnson v. Beverly-Hanks & Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.