Wooden v. Synovus Bank
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MCFADDEN, Judge.
This appeal is from a grant of summary judgment to a bank on three promissory notes signed by appellant in favor of the bank. Because there exist no genuine issues of material fact, we affirm.
Summary judgment is proper when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. OCGA § 9-11-56 (c). Ade novo standard of *877review applies to an appeal from a grant of summary judgment, and we view the evidence, and all reasonable conclusions and inferences drawn from it, in the light most favorable to the nonmovant.
Trendmark Homes v.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Core LaVista, LLC v. CummingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- Lovell v. Georgia Trust BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Trendmark Homes, Inc. v. Bank of North GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Brice v. Northwest Georgia BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
3Cited by3 opinions
- Kendra Munoz v. Selig Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
- Owen v. Bank of the OzarksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- TYLER BERRYHILL v. MIGUEL LOPEZCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2026