Woodbridge v. Desrochers

From the evidence the jury could have found that Mrs. Desrochers was causally at fault because of too great speed under the circumstances, inattention, intentional invasion of her left-hand lane rather than slowing down or stopping, or violation of section 10 of chapter 103 of the Public Laws (R. L., c. 119, s. 16). Mr. Farrington testified that he first saw the Desrochers car when he began his turn about 37feet northerly from the place of the accident and that it was then about the southerly end of the rail fence which scales 300 feet from the place of the accident. Mrs. Desrochers said she…