Burke v. Davidson
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Goolsby, Judge:
In this action involving a collision between an automobile and a bicycle, Michael Anthony Burke's appeal is based upon two exceptions: viz, (1) “[T]he court erred in failing to rule on the applicable law governing this case prior to the submission of the same to the jury[;]” and (2) “[T]he court erred in charging city ordinance Section 8-5001 of the City of Beaufort.”
These exceptions fail to satisfy the requirements of Rule 4, Section 6 of the Supreme Court Rules. See Simpson v. Cox, 95 S. C. 382, 79 S. E. 102 (1913) (excellent discussion regarding what makes a good exception).…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ramage v. RamageCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
- Colyer v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
- Simpson v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brock v. Board of Adjustment & AppealsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
- Epps v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1994