Legal Opinion

Burke v. Davidson

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided March 27, 1989No. 1313PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Goolsby, Judge:

In this action involving a collision between an automobile and a bicycle, Michael Anthony Burke's appeal is based upon two exceptions: viz, (1) “[T]he court erred in failing to rule on the applicable law governing this case prior to the submission of the same to the jury[;]” and (2) “[T]he court erred in charging city ordinance Section 8-5001 of the City of Beaufort.”

These exceptions fail to satisfy the requirements of Rule 4, Section 6 of the Supreme Court Rules. See Simpson v. Cox, 95 S. C. 382, 79 S. E. 102 (1913) (excellent discussion regarding what makes a good exception).…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ramage v. RamageCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Colyer v. ThomasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  3. Simpson v. CoxSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1913

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brock v. Board of Adjustment & AppealsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  2. Epps v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API