Legal Opinion

Champagne v. Champagne

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 31, 1910No. 17,753PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from Twentieth Judicial District Court, Parish of Terrebonne; W. P. Martin, Judge. Action by George J. Champagne against P. A. Champagne and others. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Statement of the Case.

MONROE, J.

Plaintiff alleges that his father, who was about 85 years of age, owned certain land in Terrebonne parish, which, for many years, has been cultivated as a plantation; that on August 24, 1905, he made a pretended conveyance of it, being all the property that he possessed, to his three sons, Alcide, Harry, and Ryle, retaining the usufruct for his life, the recited consideration being $9,701.88; that the conveyance was without consideration, was a fraudulent simulation and disguised donation, brought about by the undue influence of the so-called purchasers on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Montgomery v. ChaneySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858
  2. Clark v. HeddenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  3. Succession of WeberSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  4. Heirs of Dupuy v. DupontSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1856
  5. Laycock v. BirdSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1858

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Succession of Doll v. DollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
  2. Succession of GomezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  3. Succession of PiersonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
  4. Taylor v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1953
  5. Gilmore v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API