Legal Opinion

Drew v. Couch

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 5, 1988No. BR-309PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHIVERS, Judge.

Plaintiffs/appellants, Jack and Faith Drew, appeal the trial court’s order denying their motion for new trial based on jury misconduct and remarks made by defendants’ counsel during closing argument. Defendants present an issue on cross appeal, which they argue this court should consider only in the event that it finds appellants’ issues to warrant reversal.

We affirm the finding by the trial court that new trial was not warranted by a juror’s failure to reveal, during voir dire, that the senior partner of the law firm representing the plaintiff had represented the juror’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. MOBIL CHEMICAL CO., a DIV. OF MOBIL CORP. v. HawkinsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  3. Schofield v. Carnival Cruise LinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. FLA. FIRST NAT. BANK OF JACKSONVILLE v. DentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
  5. Owen v. Bay Memorial Medical CenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Couch v. DrewDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Taylor v. Public Health Trust of Dade CountyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. Taylor v. PUB. HEALTH TRUST OF DADE CTY.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API