Legal Opinion

Bitner v. Hull

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1998No. 49A04-9706-CV-237PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARRARD, Judge.

Case Summary

James Bitner (“Husband”) appeals from a second amended Qualified Domestic Relations Order (“QDRO”). We affirm.

Issues

Husband presents various issues which we consolidate and restate as follows:

I. Whether the trial court had jurisdiction to alter its decree of dissolution more than ninety days after the issuance of the decree; and,

II. Whether either of the following constituted a material change: the substitution of a percentage in place of a specific dollar judgment, and the addition of interest and/or earnings/losses to the judgment.

Facts and Procedural…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. StevensonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Dusenberry v. DusenberryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Wilson v. WilsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Wabash Railway Co. v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaghann's Korner, Inc. v. Brown & Sons Fuel Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. Grubnich v. RennerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Town of St. John v. State Board of Tax CommissionersIndiana Tax Court · 2000
  4. Romer v. RomerCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
  5. DBL Axel, LLC v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'nIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API