State v. Hanks
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Johnson
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of the crime of obtaining property by false pretenses, which was rendered against him pursuant to the verdict of a jury. The grounds of appeal are that the information fails to state a public offense, and that the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict.
Defendant Hanks arranged by correspondence with R. A. Shumate, the owner of a stallion, to have the animal sold and delivered to him at Belgrade, the agreed price for the animal and for its delivery there being $260. Before the date set for delivery Shumate received through the mail a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. KnowltonWashington Supreme Court · 1895
- State v. BallietSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901
- People v. SkidmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Ireton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- State v. FaggardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. ClineMontana Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. HaleMontana Supreme Court · 1955