Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 4, 2004No. 3D04-1158PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Richard Howard appeals the trial court’s denial of his Motion for Post-Conviction Relief. See Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850. We reverse only on the issue of whether Howard’s plea agreement was voluntary.

According to Howard, his attorney erroneously advised him that he could receive gain time on his ten-year mandatory minimum sentence. As the record does not conclusively refute Howard’s claim, he is entitled to an evidentiary hearing on the matter, for which we remand this case to the trial court. See State v. Leroux, 689 So.2d 235 (Fla.1996); Bell v. State, 746 So.2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).

We affirm…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. LerouxSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Bell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lewis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API