Cockfield v. Jeffcoat
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
In an amended complaint, appellant, Miriam Cockfield, sought damages against respondent, The South Carolina Electric and Gas Company (SCE&G), for abuse of process, negligent rendering of legal or quasi-legal advice and intentional infliction of emotional distress.1 The SCE&G demurred to the cause of action alleging the negligent rendering of advice on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The trial court sustained the demurrer. We reverse.
The material allegations of Cockfield’s amended complaint were these. Cockfield and Defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Cloniger v. ClonigerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
- Exchange Bank of Meggett v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
- Pargas of Loris, Inc. v. HenifordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
- Fennell v. Glamor Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952