Legal Opinion

Cockfield v. Jeffcoat

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 2, 1984No. 0113Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

In an amended complaint, appellant, Miriam Cockfield, sought damages against respondent, The South Carolina Electric and Gas Company (SCE&G), for abuse of process, negligent rendering of legal or quasi-legal advice and intentional infliction of emotional distress.1 The SCE&G demurred to the cause of action alleging the negligent rendering of advice on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The trial court sustained the demurrer. We reverse.

The material allegations of Cockfield’s amended complaint were these. Cockfield and Defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Beck & Gregg Hardware Co. v. Associated Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1954
  2. Cloniger v. ClonigerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1973
  3. Exchange Bank of Meggett v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1940
  4. Pargas of Loris, Inc. v. HenifordSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  5. Fennell v. Glamor Shops, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API