Legal Opinion
Concord General Mutual Insurance Co. v. McLain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided November 3, 1970PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARDEN, Justice.
On appeal from declaratory judgment in favor of plaintiff. One Lee was required to furnish proof of financial responsibility under the provisions of 29 M.R.S.A. § 781 et seq. 1 Plaintiff certified coverage of Lee by what is known as an “Operator’s” policy, “applicable to any non-owned vehicle,” which policy, effective March 13, 1969, carried an endorsement providing that “the insurance does not apply: (a) To any automobile owned by the named insured * * This coverage was accepted by the Secretary of State, who issued an unrestricted operator’s license.
On or about May 9, 1969…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Frost v. LuceySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
- McComb v. Homeworkers' Handicraft CooperativeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Inland Mutual Insurance Company v. StallingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- A. H. Benoit & Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1964
- Harris v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Planning & Resources BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Wescott v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
- Dufour v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Concord General Mutual InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Govern. Emp. Ins. v. Concord Gen. Mut. Ins.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983