Legal Opinion
Estrada v. Hills
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 8, 1975No. 74 C 2418PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MARSHALL, District Judge.
The issue pending in this motion for summary judgment is whether defendants, who are federal Government officials, are immune from liability for money damages. The gravamen is that defendants maliciously and wilfully violated Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) regulations, 1 Illinois statutes, and Chicago ordinances with respect to the maintenance of a vacant HUD building in Chicago. Plaintiffs alleged that they notified defendants repeatedly of the hazardous condition of the building, but that defendants failed to take ameliorative…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Zahn v. International Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Concerned Residents of Buck Hill Falls, by Its Trustee Ad Litem v. Kenneth Grant, as AdministratorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Dunbar v. United Steelworkers of AmericaIdaho Supreme Court · 1979
- Leo Burroughs, Jr., Cross-Appellees v. Carla Hills, Secretary, Department of Housing and Urban Development, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. American National Bank & Trust Co. of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
- Alvarez v. WilsonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.