Legal Opinion

State v. Knighton

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 3, 2006No. C040098CR; A126106PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

After a trial to a jury, defendant was convicted of first-degree burglary, first-degree theft, identity theft, and first-degree forgery. On appeal, he argues that the trial court erred in imposing a 48-month durational departure sentence on the conviction for first-degree burglary and a six-month dispositional departure sentence on the conviction for one of the counts of first-degree theft.

Defendant argues that the durational departure sentence and the dispositional departure sentence — both of which were based on aggravating facts that were not admitted by defendant nor found by a jury —…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. KnightonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API