Legal Opinion

People v. Graham

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided May 19, 1998PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

Order unanimously reversed upon the law, accusatory instrument reinstated and matter remanded for further proceedings.

We hold that the subject offense may be committed in a private apartment (contra, People v Nowak, 46 AD2d 469).

The plain language of the statute is that loitering in the first degree, i.e., loitering for the purpose of unlawfully using or possessing a controlled substance, can be committed “in any place” (Penal Law § 240.36). It is evident that the Legislature chose these words deliberately; a predecessor of the provision was far more specific,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. People v. GoodfriendNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. People v. BrisottiAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1996
  4. People v. NowakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. PestanaCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2003
  2. People v. GonzalezCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
  3. Hsiu v. TrujilloNew York Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. CullenAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2003
  5. People v. NovieAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API