Legal Opinion

Standard Oil Co. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1940PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute and need only to be stated in the briefest outline. Defendant Krueger, although himself -an employer under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, was an employee of the Standard Oil Company (hereinafter called “Standard”), a self-insurer, operating a bulk station in the distribution of its petroleum products. Defendant Tabbert was hired by Krueger with the actual knowledge of Standard. Krueger carried a work men’s compensation policy with the defendant Lumber-mens Mutual Casualty Company. Tabbert was injured on April 1, 1938, while performing services…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. President of the Manhattan Co. v. KaldenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1900

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Estate of FucelaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Chilovi v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Rehse v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. (1973), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API