Standard Oil Co. v. Industrial Commission
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The facts in this case are not in dispute and need only to be stated in the briefest outline. Defendant Krueger, although himself -an employer under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, was an employee of the Standard Oil Company (hereinafter called “Standard”), a self-insurer, operating a bulk station in the distribution of its petroleum products. Defendant Tabbert was hired by Krueger with the actual knowledge of Standard. Krueger carried a work men’s compensation policy with the defendant Lumber-mens Mutual Casualty Company. Tabbert was injured on April 1, 1938, while performing services…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- President of the Manhattan Co. v. KaldenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
3Cited by6 opinions
- Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Estate of FucelaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Chilovi v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
- Rehse v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
- (1973), Wisconsin Attorney General Reports1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.